Menu

Discussion Forum

New Discussion
Filter

Discussion Closed This discussion was created more than 6 months ago and has been closed. To start a new discussion with a link back to this one, click here.

waviness in Mises stress distribution on the mechanic contact surface

Posted Jun 3, 2020, 9:57 a.m. EDT 2 Replies

Yun Deng
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

I got a problem when simulating a process of compressing a piece of metal with a punch. As you can see in the figures, I applied a pressure on the upper punch, set fix constraint on the lower punch, the boundary condition for the sample/upper punch surface is mechanical contact, and the lower boundary of the sample is set to roller constraint.

Then I got a Mises stress on the contact surface to be very wavy, I wonder how to remove those waviness?

Best,

Yun Deng

2 Replies Last Post Jun 5, 2020, 9:22 a.m. EDT
Henrik Sönnerlind COMSOL Employee

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago Jun 3, 2020, 3:09 p.m. EDT

Hi,

Some suggestions:

  1. My first guess is that this is related to the mesh resolution. Check that you have a finer mesh on the destination side than on the source side.
  2. If you are using the penalty method, switch to augmented Lagrangian.
  3. Check that the solution is converged by reducing the tolerance.
  4. Plot solid.misesGp rather than solid.mises.
-------------------
Henrik Sönnerlind
COMSOL
Hi, Some suggestions: 1. My first guess is that this is related to the mesh resolution. Check that you have a finer mesh on the destination side than on the source side. 2. If you are using the penalty method, switch to augmented Lagrangian. 3. Check that the solution is converged by reducing the tolerance. 4. Plot solid.misesGp rather than solid.mises.
Yun Deng
Send Private Message Flag post as spam

Please login with a confirmed email address before reporting spam

Posted: 4 years ago Jun 5, 2020, 9:22 a.m. EDT

Hi,

Some suggestions:

  1. My first guess is that this is related to the mesh resolution. Check that you have a finer mesh on the destination side than on the source side.
  2. If you are using the penalty method, switch to augmented Lagrangian.
  3. Check that the solution is converged by reducing the tolerance.
  4. Plot solid.misesGp rather than solid.mises.

Thank you Henrik,

I tried to use the augemented Lagrangian method, however, I always got the error message:

Nonlinear solver did not converge. No convergence, even when using the minimum damping factor. Time: 0 s. Last time step is not converged.

I tried to change the initial value, but without any sucess:( would you mind checking my model? Thank you!

Best,

Yun

>Hi, > >Some suggestions: > >1. My first guess is that this is related to the mesh resolution. Check that you have a finer mesh on the destination side than on the source side. >2. If you are using the penalty method, switch to augmented Lagrangian. >3. Check that the solution is converged by reducing the tolerance. >4. Plot solid.misesGp rather than solid.mises. Thank you Henrik, I tried to use the augemented Lagrangian method, however, I always got the error message: Nonlinear solver did not converge. No convergence, even when using the minimum damping factor. Time: 0 s. Last time step is not converged. I tried to change the initial value, but without any sucess:( would you mind checking my model? Thank you! Best, Yun

Attachments:

Note that while COMSOL employees may participate in the discussion forum, COMSOL® software users who are on-subscription should submit their questions via the Support Center for a more comprehensive response from the Technical Support team.

Suggested Content